Property Overview: 114 Beckinsale Bay
Key Characteristics & Appeal
This home presents a compelling blend of space, modern age, and a generous lot within a well-established Winnipeg neighborhood. Its primary appeal lies in its relative newness compared to its immediate surroundings. Built in 1986, it ranks in the top 4% on its street and top 3% in the Vista neighborhood for year of construction, meaning it is among the newest homes in the area and may require less immediate updating than older counterparts.
The property stands out for its above-average lot size of 7,409 sq ft, offering more outdoor space than most homes on the street and in the neighborhood. With 1,403 sq ft of living area, it provides comfortable space that is very close to the street and city averages. The assessed value of $463k is consistently above average at every level—street, neighborhood, and citywide—reflecting its perceived market position.
This home would suit buyers looking for a move-in-ready property in a mature area without the typical upkeep challenges of a much older home. It’s ideal for those who value a larger, private yard and appreciate a home that compares favorably in both scale and modern construction within its community context. The data suggests it’s a solid, above-average property in a neighborhood of similarly well-maintained homes.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What does the "Elite" ranking for the year built actually mean?
It means this home is one of the newest on its street and in the Vista neighborhood. On Beckinsale Bay, it ranks 3rd newest out of 68 comparable homes, and 14th newest out of 502 in the neighborhood. This typically suggests more modern building materials, systems, and layout preferences.
2. Is the assessed value a reliable indicator of the listing or sale price?
The assessed value ($463k) is for municipal tax purposes and is consistently above local averages. While it's a useful benchmark, the final sale price is determined by the current market. Its above-average ranking at all levels indicates the city assesses it as a higher-value property in its peer group.
3. How does the lot size compare in practical terms?
At 7,409 sq ft, the lot is significantly larger than the street average (~5,944 sq ft). This translates to more usable backyard space, greater potential for landscaping, gardens, or additions, and potentially more distance from neighbors.
4. The living area is ranked "around average." Is that a concern?
Not necessarily. With 1,403 sq ft, it is very close to the street average (1,301 sq ft) and the city average (1,342 sq ft). It indicates the home is appropriately sized for the area—not undersized—and the appeal is bolstered by the newer construction and larger lot, rather than sheer interior square footage.
5. What is the main takeaway from all this comparative data?
The data paints a picture of a balanced, high-quality property. It doesn't lead in every single category but shows no major weaknesses. Its standout features are its newer construction and large lot, while its living space and value are consistently above average. This suggests a property that is a strong, well-rounded contender in its market segment.