Property Overview
55 Gretna Bay is a compact, 733 sqft bungalow built in 1976 on a 4,970 sqft lot in Winnipeg's Meadowood neighbourhood. The data presents a clear profile: it is a smaller, more modestly valued home compared to most in its immediate area and across the city, but with a surprisingly recent build date for its street.
Key Characteristics & Appeal
This home’s primary characteristic is its efficiency and affordability. With a living area significantly below local and city averages, it represents a lower-maintenance footprint. Its assessed value is notably below average for its street and neighbourhood, suggesting a potentially accessible entry point into the market. A key, less obvious standout is its Year Built of 1976, which ranks in the top 3% on its street. This means it is likely the newest or one of the newest homes on Gretna Bay, a potential advantage for systems and structure compared to older neighbours.
The appeal lies in its practicality. It suits first-time buyers, downsizers, or investors seeking a straightforward, lower-cost property with the benefits of a newer build date within an established area. It’s not a home for those needing ample space, but rather for those who prioritize financial efficiency and a manageable property. The lot size, while below the street average, is still a decent suburban parcel, offering outdoor space without being overwhelming to maintain.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Why is the assessed value so much lower than the last sold price range?
Assessed values for tax purposes often lag behind current market values. The 2022 sale price reflects what a buyer was willing to pay at that time, while the assessment is an administrative valuation that may not capture recent market shifts or specific property conditions.
2. As the newest home on the street, does that mean it needs fewer updates?
While its 1976 build date is newer than its neighbours, the home is still 50 years old. Key components like the roof, windows, and major mechanical systems (furnace, water heater) are likely at or beyond their typical lifespans and should be carefully inspected.
3. Who would this property not suit well?
It would be a challenging fit for growing families needing multiple bedrooms or dedicated workspaces, or for anyone who prefers a home with size and scale comparable to others on the block. Its smaller proportions are a defining feature.
4. The lot is smaller than the street average. Is that a major drawback?
Not necessarily. A slightly smaller lot can mean less yard work and lower maintenance costs. It still provides private outdoor space, which is a key feature for many buyers, without the burden of a very large plot.
5. How should I interpret the "below average" rankings for size and value?
These rankings are purely quantitative comparisons. A "below average" size and value is what makes this property an affordable option. It indicates you are paying for a more compact home, which aligns with its role as a potential starter home or a downsizing opportunity in a mature neighbourhood.