Here is a clean, standalone summary of the property at 67 Lomond Boulevard, organized as requested.
Property Overview & Buyer Suitability
This is a 1,078 sqft home built in 1966 on a 5,883 sqft lot in Windsor Park. Its key appeal lies in the assessed value. At $395,000, the home ranks in the top 29% on its street and the top 11% in the neighborhood—well above the local average of $354,200. This suggests a property with strong or improving value relative to its immediate surroundings.
While the living area is slightly below the street average (1,221 sqft), the lot size is above average for the street, offering a usable outdoor space that many comparable homes lack. The 1966 build year is notably solid, ranking in the top 10% on the street, meaning it was constructed more recently than most neighbors.
Who it suits: This property is a strong fit for a buyer who prioritizes long-term holding and value stability over raw square footage. It would suit someone who prefers a modest interior but wants a better-than-average lot in a well-established neighborhood, or a buyer who sees the below-street-average living area as an opportunity to expand or renovate. It is less suitable for anyone needing maximum interior space for the price or seeking a newer, low-maintenance build.
Five Possible FAQs
1. Is the living area small compared to similar homes?
It depends on the comparison. At 1,078 sqft, it is smaller than the average home on Lomond Boulevard (1,221 sqft). However, it sits in the middle of the neighborhood average (1,091 sqft) and is slightly below the citywide average (1,342 sqft). It is not unusually small for its area, but it is not generous.
2. How does the property’s assessed value compare to what I might pay?
The assessed value is $395,000, which is above the street average and well above the neighborhood average. This usually means property taxes are based on a higher figure. It does not guarantee the sale price, but it indicates the city views this home as having above-average value relative to its peers, which can affect both taxes and resale potential.
3. Is the lot large enough for additions or a garage?
At 5,883 sqft, the lot is above average for the street (6,165 sqft is the average) and slightly below the citywide average. It is spacious enough for a typical single-family home footprint plus a detached garage or modest addition, but zoning and setback rules would need to be checked. It is not a deep or wide lot, so significant expansion may be limited.
4. How does this home’s age affect maintenance expectations?
Built in 1966, it is newer than most homes in the neighborhood (average is 1961) and the same as the citywide average. A 1960s build is generally considered mid-century construction. Buyers should expect original systems (plumbing, electrical, insulation) may need upgrading, and materials like windows or roofing may be original or near end-of-life. It is not old enough to be considered historic, but it is not low-maintenance either.
5. How does this property rank within the broader city?
It ranks decently but not exceptionally. For assessed value, it is in the top 40% citywide. For living area, it is in the top 63%. The lot size ranks in the top 35%. The strongest ranking is the year built, which is in the top 52%. This means it is a solid, mid-range citywide performer, with its strongest standout feature being its neighbourhood value ranking.