This home at 3 Langdale Way, built in 2002, is a solid, modern option in Winnipeg’s Whyte Ridge neighbourhood. The house itself measures 1,254 square feet, which is slightly smaller than the average for both its street and the broader community, but it's close to the city-wide average. The land parcel is 4,690 square feet—again, a bit below the local norm but on par with what you’d find across the city.
What stands out is the construction year. The home is younger than nearly everything around it—ranking in the top 10% for the neighbourhood and top 17% city-wide—which means fewer immediate concerns about major systems like roofing or mechanicals compared to older stock. Its assessed value sits at $481,000, which is affordable relative to the Whyte Ridge average ($530,000) but above the city-wide average, reflecting the area’s desirability.
The property’s strongest appeal is for buyers who want a newer home in a mature, well-established suburban pocket without paying a premium for maximum square footage. It suits first-time buyers looking for something move-in ready, or downsizers who value a newer build over a large lot. The numbers suggest it’s a practical choice that doesn’t lead the street in size or price, but gives you modern bones at a reasonable entry point for the area.
-
How do these rank percentages actually translate to value?
The property ranks near the bottom of its street and community for size, but the city-wide ranking (top 45% for living area, top 23% for assessed value) shows that size here is less of a factor than location. You’re paying for the neighbourhood, not the square footage, which can be a smart trade-off.
-
Why is the assessed value above the city average but below the community average?
Whyte Ridge is a higher-value area than many parts of Winnipeg. This home sits at the lower end of that local market, making it more accessible to buyers who want into the suburb without stretching to the top of its price range.
-
What does the “close to average” land size mean for outdoor space?
The lot is about 10% smaller than the street average, which is typical for newer infill or compact builds. It’s not a postage stamp, but you won’t have a sprawling yard. It suits someone who wants a manageable outdoor area without heavy upkeep.
-
Is there any catch with a 2002 build in this price range?
Generally no—homes from the early 2000s are often in a sweet spot where major components (windows, shingles, furnace) still have life left, and construction standards are more modern than older stock. You may want to check the specific maintenance history, but based on age alone, it’s a good bet.
-
Does the “below average” ranking on the street mean it’s a less desirable property?
Not necessarily. The rankings reflect size and value, not condition or layout. Being smaller and lower-priced on a street of larger homes can actually mean you’re getting better value per dollar—especially if the street itself is sought-after. It’s a location play, not a compromise.