1665 Pritchard Avenue

Property Overview: 1665 Pritchard Avenue, Winnipeg

Key Characteristics & Appeal

This is a modest, one-storey home built in 1955 on a standard city lot in the Burrows-Keewatin neighbourhood. Its primary appeal lies in its straightforward, low-maintenance footprint and its position as an affordable entry point into the Winnipeg market. With 1,011 sqft of living space and a detached garage, it offers the essentials without complexity.

The data reveals some thoughtful perspectives. While the home itself is unassuming, its lot size is notably larger than many on its street, offering above-average outdoor space for the immediate area. The home is also newer than most on Pritchard Avenue, which may suggest fewer concerns related to the very oldest housing stock. It suits first-time buyers, investors looking for a rental property, or downsizers seeking a simple, manageable home without the burden of a basement or extensive upkeep. The last known sale was in 2017 for $21,700, and its assessed value remains low, highlighting its role as a value-oriented option.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What does the assessed value tell me about this property?
The assessed value is significantly below the Winnipeg city average, reflecting the home’s modest size, age, and neighbourhood. It indicates a property with very low property taxes, which is a key part of its affordability.

2. How does the lot size compare?
At just under 4,000 sqft, the lot is larger than many on Pritchard Avenue itself. However, it is smaller than the average lot in both the broader Burrows-Keewatin area and city-wide. This means you get a decent yard for the street, but not an unusually large parcel.

3. Is the living space sufficient for a small family?
At 1,011 sqft, the living area is compact. It is above average for the Burrows-Keewatin neighbourhood but below the city-wide average. It would be a comfortable fit for an individual, couple, or very small family comfortable with efficient use of space.

4. What are the implications of having no basement?
The lack of a basement limits storage and potential for a traditional rec room or secondary suite development. It simplifies the structure (no flood risk or moisture issues underground) but means all mechanical systems and living areas are on the single floor.

5. How does the 1955 build year compare to nearby homes?
Built in 1955, this home is notably newer than the average home on its own street (where the average build year is 1937). This relative newness for the street could be an advantage, but it still requires a thorough inspection for issues common to mid-century construction.