90 Leander Crescent

Property Overview: 90 Leander Crescent

Key Characteristics & Buyer Profile

This home stands out most clearly for its living space. At 2,148 square feet, it ranks in the top 11% within the Whyte Ridge community and the top 8% citywide, offering considerably more room than the average home in Winnipeg. Its assessed value of $579,000 reflects that size advantage, coming in above typical values for both the street and the broader area. The house was built in 2001, making it newer than many properties in Whyte Ridge and the city as a whole, but slightly older than some of the newer builds on Leander Crescent specifically. The trade-off is the lot: at 4,395 square feet, it’s noticeably smaller than the average for the neighbourhood and the city. The appeal here is for buyers who prioritize interior square footage and a relatively modern build over a large yard. It’s well-suited for a family or someone who wants a substantial home without the maintenance demands of a sprawling property, particularly in a well-established, family-oriented neighbourhood like Whyte Ridge.

Five Frequently Asked Questions

1. How does this home’s value compare to similar properties in the area?

The home’s assessed value of $579,000 is above average for Leander Crescent (about 30% higher than the street’s median), and well above the Whyte Ridge and citywide medians. This is largely driven by its larger-than-average living area. It’s a property that’s valued for its interior space within a neighbourhood where that feature is less common.

2. What is the significance of the smaller lot size?

The lot is roughly 800 square feet smaller than the average for Whyte Ridge. For some buyers, this is an advantage—less yard work, lower maintenance, and possibly a bit more privacy from neighbours. For others, it’s a compromise if they were hoping for a traditional large backyard or room for landscaping. It’s a practical trade-off for the larger house footprint.

3. How does the build year affect the home’s condition and layout?

Built in 2001, the home is 24 years old as of the latest data. That puts it in a useful middle ground: it’s modern enough to have more efficient building standards and likely an open-concept layout, but not brand-new. A buyer should expect typical wear for a house of that age—things like a roof, furnace, or windows may be approaching the end of their expected lifespan depending on prior maintenance.

4. Is this a good investment in the current market?

The rankings suggest strong relative value: the home is in the top 10% of assessed values citywide, but its living space is in the top 8%. That means you are getting above-average square footage for your dollar in terms of assessed value. However, resale potential may hinge on whether future buyers also prioritise interior space over lot size, as the smaller yard could limit appeal for some.

5. What should a buyer look out for during a home inspection?

Given the 2001 build, focus on the age of major systems: the roof, furnace, central air, and water heater. Also check for any signs of settling or water intrusion around the foundation, especially since the lot is compact. The home’s size means it likely has a more complex HVAC system (e.g., zones or multiple units), so ensure that’s been well-maintained.