1061 Scurfield Boulevard – Property Summary
Key Characteristics & Ideal Buyer Profile
This 1,565 sqft home, built in 1993, sits on a 5,028 sqft lot in the Whyte Ridge neighbourhood of Winnipeg. Its main appeal lies in the living space and assessed value relative to the broader city. Citywide, the home ranks in the top 27% for living area and top 21% for assessed value—meaning you get more square footage and higher estimated value than most comparable Winnipeg homes. The year built also places it well above the citywide average (1966), so construction is notably newer than many options on the market.
However, the trade-offs become visible at the street and neighbourhood levels. The lot is smaller than the averages for both Scurfield Boulevard (5,755 sqft) and Whyte Ridge (6,175 sqft), and the assessed value on the street itself sits below average. This suggests the home is priced modestly relative to its immediate neighbours, while still offering strong citywide value.
This property would suit a buyer who prioritizes interior space and a newer build over a large yard or a high-status street address. It’s a practical fit for someone who wants more room inside without paying a premium for lot size or curb appeal—perhaps a growing family, a first-time buyer moving up, or someone who values efficient use of space over sprawling grounds.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. How does this home compare to others in Whyte Ridge?
It’s around average for living area and year built within the neighbourhood, but the land area is below the neighbourhood norm. The assessed value is also slightly below the Whyte Ridge average, so it’s a more affordable entry point into the area for the square footage you get.
2. Is the smaller lot a disadvantage?
It depends on your needs. The lot is about 750 sqft smaller than the street average. If you want a large garden, room for a workshop, or privacy from neighbours, this might feel tight. But if you prefer less yard maintenance and more indoor space, it’s a reasonable compromise.
3. Why is the assessed value above average citywide but below average on the street?
The street has several larger or newer homes—likely with higher assessed values—pulling the local average up. Citywide, most comparable homes are older or smaller, so this property stacks up well. It’s a reflection of the neighbourhood’s overall desirability, not a flaw in the home itself.
4. What does “rank by year, newer = better rank” mean practically?
It means the home is newer than the median for most of the city, which can be a plus for maintenance, energy efficiency, and modern layout choices. But on this street (where the average build year is 1996), it’s slightly older than neighbours, so don’t expect top-tier modern finishes unless they were updated.
5. Should I pay attention to the “red / blue / amber / gray” color coding in the rankings?
The colors indicate performance tiers—green or blue usually means you’re outperforming a larger share of peers, while red or amber suggests you’re below average for that category. For this property, expect blue or green for living area and assessed value citywide, and amber or red for land area and street-level value. It’s a quick visual check, not a substitute for your own priorities.